🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.